Hiding dark light from a dark force rrom the sun.

Suppose there was an extra force with a weak coupling to a nucleon. The stefan boltzmann law would then have the sun shine an equal amount of dark light as regular lighht even if the coupling was weak, energy in wave equipartions, so thesun would lose twice as much energy with twice the amount of force carriers. We would have noticed the extra energy loss, and maybe detected the extra energy on earth. How can we concell this dark light. Suppose dark matter is a good conductor of the dark force. For example if dark matter is sterlie neutrinos and the dark force is our axial force between neutrinos (and also nucleons). Such a conductor would reflect the dark light. We would suppose that the dark matter is held some distance away from the sun, by the energy of the dark light reflected by it, equalling the gravition attraction of its mass. For a good conductor all the dark light would be hidden. There would be a convection zone where the enerhy of dark light is absorbed. This might be the reason the solar corona is a million degrees, while the surface of the sun is only 6000 degrees C.

Article on Testing Non standard Neutrino Properties at Arxiv

https://www.arxiv.org/abs/2501.04309

Limits on new gauge vector forces and associated mass giving scalars for Z decay

The new paper at ArXiv https://www.arxiv.org/abs/2501.04388 by Peli and Trocsanyi linit show how Higgs Bosons decay measurements can limit new Bosons. The current measurement of Z width is not yet strong enough to limit all new models.

  The SM theoretical prediction for the Higgs boson width is ΓSM
h = 4.07 MeV, with
a relative uncertainty of 4% [3]. The experimental measurements on the other hand are
ΓATLAS
h = 4.5+3.3
−2.5 MeV [17] and ΓCMS
h = 3.2+2.4
−1.7 MeV [18], display a much larger uncertainty
than the SM theoretical prediction allowing for several BSM models to remain compatible
with observations.

Nova and T2K find non unitary mixing 3 sigma - Excess Neutrinos more than expected from oscillations - Neutrino Decay or Neutrino Pair Production

In https://www.arxiv.org/pdf/2501.00146 Yu et al Analysis results from the 295 Kilometer far detector from J-PARC, T2k, and the 810 Kilometer far detector at Fermilab both with Gev Muon Neutrino, both seem to show excess electron neutrinos more than can be expect from Unitary (Preversing Particle Number) Oscillations of Neutrinos, the Nova detector show this much more strongly than T2k. Could Muon Neutinos be pair producing electron neutinos by scattering along the way, v_mu->v_mu + v_e + v-bar_e? As our axial force might do. The amount of extra electron neutrinos is 6% averaged over both experiments.

DESI results don't favour a cosmological constant but a varying quintessence of some form.

The DESI results using Baryon Ascotic oscillations together with supernova spectrum to find galaxy velocity, seem at (3.4 Sigma) not to favour the cosmological constant but an dark energy or quintessence that reduces with time. Combined results have the equation of state parameter as 0.86 +.10 -.11. Zheng et al in https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04830 Remember our axial force modelled qunintessence as a neutrino dark energy caused by the attractive force between neutrinos, which we estimate an equation of state or owega of 17/18 or 0.94444.

Recent Paper looks for Lepton Axial force in solar oscillations.

In https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.10724 Fang et al, look at how the matter effect on an lepton axial force world effect neutrio oscillation, and provide a strong exclusion g_vv g_A <10^-51. However they assume that all protons and neutrons have exactly the same axial force interaction. Because of conversation in beta decay we must have Q(n)=1+Q(p) so neutons and protons might have opposite charges .e.g 1/2 escaping Fangs, bounds. With photons and neutrons being oppositely charged to oscillation measurement might be very changed, and also if matter is net uncharged due to a background of slow neutrinos in matter.

Neutron Lifetime Puzzle

The neutron lifetime puzzle is that neutrons in beam have a lifetime of around 887 sec, while neutrons trapped in a magnetic bottle have a lifetime 1% less of around 877 secs. In https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.10024 Giacosa and Pagliara suggest resolving this through the quantum zero effect, to do so some new physics must be observing or interacting with the neutron in a bottle, every billionth of a second. Consider a neutrino background interacting with the axial force with strength 1/10000, we might have 1*10^17 neutrinos per cubic centimeter and the range might of the force might be 5nm. I each 5nm cubic there would be = 0.01 neutrinos, but they would be travelling new light speed, so in 10^-9 secconds, about 0.3 would pass. Giving approximately the correct amount of lifetime reduction, and better a good fit if the density was 3 time larger at 3*10^17 neutrino. Experimentally this could be confirmed by having a magnetic bottle far neutron or proton rich material to reduce the neutrion background. A magnesium 24 magnetic bottle held in a vacuum in a large room might remove a lot of the neutrion background, leaving the results near the beam decay rate. Indeed such neutron decay in a magnetic bottle might be a excellent detector of the density of a neutrino background.